Paparazzi restaurant short hills mall series#

Some states like New York, are very permissive. The general category is known as the right to privacy (if you follow law/politics at all, this was the right invoked in a variety of private sexuality and Roe v.

I can only answer this question relative to the United States, but there are actually a variety of common law and statutory law issues that prevent the above scenario from taking place. If I have music playing in my house too loud, it is bothersome, but not harassing, but if I intentionally point the speakers at you because I know it bothers you, my intent is to annoy, then that can be harassment. My standing in front of your building yelling about the flying spaghetti monster and his wanting to save you may be annoying and harassing, but the intent isn't to harass, only persuade. Although it feels harassing, that is not the intent of the behavior, just a byproduct. With celebrities, the intent is to capture images of interest to the public (target buyers). When these actions are coupled with an intent to instill fear or injury, however, they may constitute a pattern of behavior that is illegal. For example, sending flowers, writing love notes, and waiting for someone outside her place of work are actions that, on their own, are not criminal.

Paparazzi restaurant short hills mall series#

Stalking is a distinctive form of criminal activity composed of a series of actions that taken individually might constitute legal behavior. They also don't break into homes, vehicles, hotel rooms, etc.Īnd they do not threaten violence or suicide or create a climate of fear. They do not send gifts and/or ask for dates nor do they express feelings of love or sexual desire. It certainly does not mean that common paparazzi tactics involving verbal and physical (not usually any touching) assault are allowed.Ģ) ''paparazzi' do not: Incessantly call, write or email the celebrity. This doesn't mean that all manner of stalking is legal (it's threatening/harassing). Just social ramifications.ġ) It is legal to take pictures most places in public. You would be stopped and spoken to by police and people trying to figure out what's going on when your target asks for help.

Socially, you would be ostracized if you started breaking social norms and following somebody around, freaking them out. Celebrities have too many papparazzi following them to take our restraining orders on every single one, and then it takes about 30 minutes for police to respond to non-violent restraining order calls. If someone feels uncomfortable enough about it they could go to the police, but so long as you didn't technically break any laws they would have a hard time making something stick.